You are here: Home » Monthly Archives » December 2007 Archives

December 2007 Archives

Its not the memories of my living room engulfed in flames that bothers me on xmas. Its not the years of having to put on a contrived, faux-impromptu caroling scene for Don and Donna before we could open presents. Its not the crass consumerism or the cultural anxiety of having to perform ill-defined rituals properly lest you be branded a disappointment. Its the attempt at historical meaning and philosophy that get me down this time of year (that and the lack of sunlight).

I love giving and getting gifts. Cards, pictures, stories about friends and families' lives are a great way to connect after a busy year. But someone always has to throw in the sad attempt at historical interpretation, usually accompanied by some trite bit of pseudo-philosophy that is supposed to be profound.

This year we ended up back on the family address list (I didn't know such a thing existed, you'd think that if I were on it I would have been sent one). That got us a gem from an aunt who has spent her whole life too obsessed with the trappings of art/intelligence/mothering/socializing/housekeeping to have developed any actual skills.

I won't diverge into the inane retelling of the myth of St. Nicholas as if it were historical fact, nor the lunacy of a Mormon siding with a Catholic against the Arian heresy (the theological equivalent of a Capitalist siding with the Fascists against the Communists). It was all a waste of paper the first time around. How that story tied to a long, pointless justification for spending her life having 12 children I'll never know.

I'll just share this little memory: When MLEIV and I were first together we spent xmas with my family. She and I had been studying Greek that semester and had found a little tidbit of interest in the Greek New Testament. It seems that the Greek has the angels saying "good tidings to men of good will" instead of "good tidings, good will to men." We thought it was interesting, a new twist on an old idea. Don threw a fit, stomped upstairs and pulled out his KJV and proudly declared "that isn't how it reads in the *authorized* version that our leaders have accepted as true."

The leader has spoken. The priesthood has laid down the law. All debate now ends. And they wonder why we haven't spent xmas with them since.

The moral of the story: if you have some historically inaccurate, philosophically dubious, piece of tripe to spread go with (the Mormon) God, my friend! However, if you have something useful and interesting to say, STFU you dirty little heretic.

Merry pagan-solstice-ritual-turned-Christian-mass-turned-consumer-whore-day!
Scientists already have a bad rap from some parts of society because they have the audacity to not take things on faith, but instead require evidence and proof. So it is rare to see them go out of their way to kill off myths (myth-buster's aside, they are more interested in ratings and doing extreme things and only appeal to a geek audience anyway). That's why I loved this article in the British Medical Journal. Apparently their xmas edition is always on the lighter side, but this was just brilliant!

Some of the myths I hadn't believed in years (reading in dim light ruins your eyesight, for example), others I had suspected were false but didn't have any hard evidence (eating turkey makes you drowsy), others I thought were true because my doctor had told me so (drink 8 glasses of water a day). But my favorite from the middle category is the myth that we only use 10% of our brain (and the extended version: that Einstein used 11% of his). Any cursory scientific study of what we know of the human brain quickly makes this seem absurd. Which part do we use? Which (massive) parts don't we use? How would MRI scans be useful (you'd need a huge magnifier just to see the little active part)?

More interesting to me is why these myths persist. Perhaps suspicion that something is false doesn't outweigh social browbeating ("well, that seems wrong but all of you are forcibly denouncing me for disagreeing, so I'll capitulate"). Or maybe (like the 10% of the brain one) we want to believe it. Wouldn't it be nice if all we needed to excel in life was more mental exercise? People try to sell you on the idea that you can exercise your eyes to better vision, why not your brain?

Socially backed myths are powerful forces and to fight against them gets you ostracized, branded a heretic, tortured and/or burned alive. So its no surprise that they persist but that makes evidence against them all the more admirable.

No, Virginia, there is no Santa Clause
Is it the nature of all technology projects or just this specific one that the developers seem bored by their own work? As they explain what their code is supposed to do they sound less interested than I am. Their power points are a panoply of colors and lines and boxes with arrows and text. The visuals are painful to the eye and tiring to the brain. Then you throw in a developer who is supposed to be explaining this mess and he sounds like he's about to put himself to sleep.

How are we supposed to find that interesting? I guess that's what sales people are for.